Business Law NEW

Excise Duty on Immovable Boilers: Bought-Out Items Not Included in Assessable Value

Supreme Court rules that value of duty-paid bought-out items delivered directly at buyer's site cannot be included in assessable value of boilers cleared in completely knocked down (CKD) condition, as the erected boiler becomes an immovable property and hence not excisable goods.

Case Reference: Lipi Boilers Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad (Civil Appeal Nos. 856-857 of 2011) Decided by: Supreme Court of India Date: November 10, 2025

❓ Question

If you manufacture boilers and supply them in completely knocked down (CKD) condition, paying excise duty on them, and also supply separately purchased items directly to the buyer's site without bringing them to your factory, can the excise department demand duty on the value of these bought-out items as part of the boiler's assessable value?

✅ Answer

No, the excise department cannot demand duty on the value of these bought-out items.

The Supreme Court has ruled that when a boiler is erected and installed at the buyer's site, it becomes an immovable property and ceases to be "goods" for the purpose of excise duty. The value of duty-paid bought-out items delivered directly at the buyer's site cannot be included in the assessable value of boilers cleared in CKD condition.

⚖️ Understanding the Legal Principles

🔹 Excise Duty is on Manufacture, Not Sale

  • Central excise duty is levied on manufacture of goods
  • Section 3 of Central Excise Act is the charging provision
  • Section 4 is merely a valuation provision
  • Valuation cannot determine excitability of goods

🔹 Immovable Property is Not "Goods"

  • Goods must be movable to be excisable
  • Boilers erected at site become immovable property
  • Immovable property cannot be bought and sold as goods
  • Test of marketability not satisfied for immovable items

🔹 Assembly vs Erection Distinction

  • Assembly creates movable goods
  • Erection creates immovable property
  • Massive boilers cannot be assembled before erection
  • Erection involves civil works making item immovable

📜 Key Legal Timeline

2001

Contract Signed - Lipi Boilers entered into agreement for designing, procuring, manufacturing and supplying machinery for steam generating plant

April 2005

Show Cause Notice - Assistant Commissioner issued show cause notice alleging undervaluation by excluding bought-out items worth ₹14,02,344

December 2005

Order-in-Original - Assistant Commissioner dropped demand, holding boilers erected at site are not goods and hence not excisable

July 2007

Order-in-Appeal - Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed revenue's appeal, affirming Assistant Commissioner's order

September 2010

CESTAT Order - Tribunal reversed lower authorities, held value of bought-out items includable in assessable value

November 2025

Supreme Court Judgment - Allowed assessee's appeal, held value of bought-out items not includable in assessable value

🧭 Your Action Plan: Navigating Excise Duty on Site-Erected Equipment

📝 If You're Facing Excise Duty Demand on Site-Erected Equipment

✅ Step 1: Establish Immovability

  • Document the erection process involving civil works
  • Show integration with foundation and permanent structures
  • Demonstrate dismantling would cause substantial damage
  • Establish the item cannot be moved without destruction

✅ Step 2: Distinguish Between Assembly and Erection

  • Show the process involves more than mere assembly
  • Document use of construction materials (cement, bricks, etc.)
  • Establish permanent attachment to earth
  • Demonstrate beneficial enjoyment requires permanent fixing

✅ Step 3: Challenge Extended Period Invocation

  • Show no suppression of facts with intent to evade duty
  • Establish all facts were in returns filed with department
  • Argue bona fide belief based on settled legal position
  • Challenge invocation beyond normal limitation period

⚖️ Key Legal Provisions to Reference

Legal Principle What It Means Application in This Case
Section 3 - Charging Section Excise duty is on manufacture of excisable goods Must first establish goods are excisable before valuation
Section 4 - Valuation Section Provides method to compute duty on excisable goods Cannot be used to determine whether goods are excisable
Movability Test Goods must be movable to be excisable Boiler erected at site becomes immovable property
Marketability Test Goods must be capable of being bought and sold Immovable boiler cannot be marketed as goods

📘 Key Legal Terms Explained

CKD (Completely Knocked Down)

A condition where goods are supplied in disassembled parts for ease of transportation, to be assembled at destination.

Excisable Goods

Goods specified in Central Excise Tariff as being subject to duty of excise. Must be movable and marketable.

Immovable Property

Property that cannot be moved, including land, benefits arising from land, and things attached to earth.

Bought-Out Items

Components purchased from other manufacturers and supplied along with self-manufactured goods.

Assessable Value

The value on which excise duty is calculated, normally the transaction value under Section 4.

🚨 What to Avoid in Excise Duty Compliance

❌ Don't Confuse Valuation with Excisability

  • Don't assume items in tariff schedule are automatically excisable
  • Avoid using transaction value to prove excitability
  • Don't ignore movability and marketability tests
  • Avoid mixing up charging and valuation provisions

❌ Don't Treat Erection as Manufacture

  • Don't assume assembly at site amounts to manufacture
  • Avoid treating immovable property as excisable goods
  • Don't ignore civil works involved in erection
  • Avoid treating permanent installations as movable goods

💡 Core Takeaway from the Supreme Court

"The duty of excise is chargeable with reference to the value of the excisable goods, but the measure employed for assessing a tax must not be confused with the nature of the tax itself. Valuation is a consequence of levy, not its determinant. The 'transaction value' becomes relevant only after the taxable event, i.e. manufacture of excisable goods, is first established."

This judgment reaffirms the foundational principle that excise duty is a duty on manufacture, not on sale. It clarifies that valuation provisions cannot be used to bring immovable property within the ambit of excisable goods. The ruling protects manufacturers from arbitrary demands on items that cease to be goods once erected at site.

📞 When to Seek Professional Help

👨‍⚖️ Legal Counsel Essential For

  • Challenging excise duty demands on site-erected equipment
  • Complex excise disputes involving immovable property
  • Cases involving interpretation of charging vs valuation provisions
  • Appeals against incorrect application of excise law principles
  • Cases involving invocation of extended period of limitation

📝 You Can Handle With Support

  • Basic understanding of excise duty principles
  • Documentation of erection process and immovability
  • Initial assessment of whether equipment qualifies as goods
  • Understanding basic legal principles from this judgment
  • Preparation of initial responses to show cause notices

⚠️ DISCLAIMER

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.

🌿 LegalEcoSys Mission

Making Supreme Court judgments accessible and actionable for every Indian citizen navigating legal challenges.

This analysis decodes a complex excise duty dispute to help businesses understand when site-erected equipment qualifies as excisable goods and how to challenge incorrect duty demands.