Supreme Court clarifies that police powers under Section 102 CrPC (seizure) and Section 18A of Prevention of Corruption Act (attachment) are not mutually exclusive - police can freeze accounts during investigation under Section 102 CrPC even in PC Act cases.
CAN POLICE FREEZE BANK ACCOUNTS UNDER SECTION 102 CRPC WHEN INVESTIGATING A CASE UNDER THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, OR ARE THEY LIMITED TO USING ONLY SECTION 18A OF THE PC ACT FOR ATTACHMENT PROCEEDINGS?
YES, POLICE CAN USE SECTION 102 CRPC FOR FREEZING ACCOUNTS. The Supreme Court has ruled that the powers under Section 18A of the Prevention of Corruption Act (which deals with attachment through court process) and Section 102 CrPC (police seizure powers) are NOT mutually exclusive. Police can freeze accounts during investigation under Section 102 CrPC to secure evidence and prevent disposal of property, even in cases registered under the PC Act.
Initial Complaint: Preliminary enquiry against Prabir Kumar Dey Sarkar (respondent's son) for disproportionate assets
FIR Registered: FIR No. 09/19 registered under PC Act
Accounts Frozen: Respondent's fixed deposits frozen under Section 102 CrPC
Trial Court Rejects Application: City Sessions Court rejects application for de-freezing accounts
High Court Allows Petition: Calcutta High Court sets aside freezing, directs de-freezing accounts
Chargesheet Filed: Chargesheet presented against 4 accused including respondent
Supreme Court Judgment: SC allows appeal, upholds police power under Section 102 CrPC
| Procedure | Who Can Do It | Time Required | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section 102 CrPC (Seizure) | Any Police Officer | Immediate | Secure evidence, prevent disposal during investigation |
| Section 18A PC Act (Attachment) | State/Central Government through Court | Time-consuming (weeks/months) | Judicial attachment to prevent alienation of property |
| Both Can Apply | Police & Judicial Authorities | Simultaneous/Sequential | Different purposes, not mutually exclusive |
Taking possession of property by police during investigation when it is suspected to be connected with an offence.
Legal process where court orders property to be taken into custody to prevent its disposal during legal proceedings.
Legal principle that two laws/provisions cannot apply simultaneously - one excludes the other.
Special law to prevent corruption among public servants and punish offenders.
Main procedural law governing administration of criminal justice in India.
"We hold that the power of seizure and attachment are separate and distinct, even if, to the naked eye it may so appear, that the effect is same/similar which is, that the property is taken into custody of, by the authority, either investigative or judicial. Consequentially, the conclusion to be drawn is that the powers under Section 18A of the PC Act and Section 102, CrP.C. are not mutually exclusive."
This landmark judgment clarifies that police powers under general criminal procedure (CrPC) and special laws (PC Act) can operate together. The Supreme Court emphasized that different legal provisions can serve complementary purposes, and the existence of a special procedure under the PC Act does not exclude the application of general police powers under CrPC during investigations.
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.
Making Supreme Court judgments accessible and actionable for every Indian citizen navigating legal challenges.
This analysis decodes a complex criminal procedure judgment to help citizens understand police powers during investigations and the relationship between general criminal procedure and special laws like the Prevention of Corruption Act.