Supreme Court rules that when sellers accept additional payment after a contract's deadline, they waive their right to cancel the contract for that delay.
If a property seller accepts more money after a contract's deadline has passed, and then sells the property to a relative, can the original buyer still enforce the sale, or is the contract dead?
Yes, the original buyer can still enforce the sale. The Supreme Court ruled that when sellers accept additional payment after a contract's deadline, they waive their right to cancel the contract for that delay. The contract remains alive. If the sellers then breach this still-active contract by selling the property to a related party, the original buyer is entitled to a court order for "specific performance," compelling the sellers to complete the sale as originally agreed.
Sale Agreement Signed: D-1 and D-2 agreed to sell property to Annamalai for โน4,80,000. โน4,70,000 paid in advance, โน10,000 balance to be paid within six months.
Additional Payment Made: After the six-month deadline, sellers demanded and accepted additional โน1,95,000. Endorsement made on back of agreement.
Property Sold to Relative: D-1 and D-2 sold part of the property to D-3 (Vasanthi), who was daughter of D-1.
Termination Notice Sent: Sellers sent notice cancelling the contract with Annamalai.
Buyer Responded: Annamalai sent reply notice stating contract was subsisting and he was ready to perform his obligations.
The Court reinforced that a contract is a dynamic relationship, and the parties' conduct can modify its terms.
The Court emphasized the legal weight of formal documents and signatures.
The Court clarified the technical requirements for a lawsuit seeking to enforce a sale agreement.
The Court reaffirmed that the relief of specific performance is not a gift from the court but a rightful remedy when certain conditions are met.
Always get proper receipts and endorsements for any additional payments made after the original agreement.
If you want to enforce a deadline, do not accept any payments after that deadline has passed without a formal extension agreement.
Always respond to legal notices promptly and appropriately. Silence can be interpreted as acceptance.
A court order compelling a party to fulfill their obligations under a contract, such as executing a sale deed, as opposed to merely paying monetary compensation.
The voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a known right. In this case, the sellers waived their right to cancel the contract for delay by accepting more money after the deadline.
A legal requirement for a buyer seeking specific performance, meaning they must have the financial capacity and the consistent intention to perform their part of the contract throughout the transaction.
A legal principle that, when a person's signature is admitted on a document, the benefit of the doubt regarding its genuineness lies with the party presenting the document, unless the signer provides a strong, proven explanation to the contrary.
"A contract is not a static scripture but a living covenant, interpreted through the conduct of its parties. When a seller's hand is outstretched to accept further consideration, it signals not merely a transaction but an affirmation of the agreement's enduring life. The law must discern between a technical breach and a waived condition, ensuring that justice enforces the legitimate expectations born of a party's own actions, not merely the dry ink of a lapsed clause."
This judgment powerfully protects buyers from sellers who engage in sharp practices, affirming that the courts will look at the substance of the transaction and the conduct of the parties to do complete justice.
โ ๏ธ DISCLAIMER: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.