Supreme Court upholds 24% interest rate in commercial loan agreements, ruling that high-risk transactions with defaulting borrowers can justify higher rates. Court clarifies that arbitration awards based on contractual interest rates don't violate public policy unless rates are "so perverse as to shock the conscience of the Court."
Can a 24% interest rate in a commercial loan agreement be challenged as unconscionable or against public policy when the borrower defaults and the matter goes to arbitration?
Generally No, especially in high-risk commercial transactions.
The Supreme Court has ruled that a 24% interest rate in commercial loan agreements is not automatically unconscionable or against public policy. The Court emphasized that high-risk transactions, particularly those involving borrowers with previous default history, can justify higher interest rates. Arbitrators have wide discretion to award contractual interest rates unless they are "so perverse as to shock the conscience of the Court."
Loan Agreements Executed - Appellants borrowed ₹1.57 crore from NBFC at 24% interest to clear previous bank default
Default and Settlement Attempts - Partial payments made, bounced cheque issued for settlement, criminal proceedings under NI Act initiated
Arbitration Initiated - NBFC invoked arbitration clause, claimed ₹2.21 crore with 24% interest
Arbitral Award - Arbitrator awarded claimed amount with 24% interest from date of claim filing
Court Challenges - Section 34 petition dismissed by Single Judge, Section 37 appeal dismissed by Division Bench
Supreme Court Final Ruling - Upheld arbitral award and 24% interest rate, clarified public policy standards
| Legal Provision | What It Means | Application in This Case |
|---|---|---|
| Section 31(7) Arbitration Act | Gives arbitrators discretion to award interest; post-award interest mandatory at 18% unless specified otherwise | Arbitrator exercised discretion to award contractual 24% rate |
| Section 34 Arbitration Act | Limited grounds to challenge arbitral awards; no re-appreciation of evidence allowed | Court refused to interfere with arbitrator's factual findings |
| Public Policy Exception | Award can be set aside if against fundamental policy of Indian law or basic morality | 24% interest in commercial context didn't meet this high threshold |
| Usurious Loans Act, 1918 | Historical legislation to protect against excessive interest rates | Court ruled it doesn't apply to modern commercial arbitration |
The final decision made by an arbitrator in a dispute, which is binding on the parties and can only be challenged on limited grounds.
Interest that accrues on the award amount from the date the award is made until actual payment. Statutory rate is 18% unless award specifies different rate.
A legal concept used to refuse enforcement of contracts or awards that would be harmful to societal interests or fundamental principles of justice.
A contract so extremely unfair that it shocks the conscience, typically involving gross inequality of bargaining power and oppressive terms.
Financial institutions that provide banking services without meeting legal definition of a bank, regulated by RBI but with different lending norms.
"In the realm of commercial transactions, particularly those involving high-risk lending to defaulting borrowers, the sanctity of contractual terms must be respected. A 24% interest rate, while substantial, does not per se cross the threshold of being so unconscionable as to shock the conscience of the Court. The discretion vested in arbitrators to award contractual interest rates is wide, and judicial interference is warranted only in the rarest of cases where the award is patently illegal or violates the fundamental policy of Indian law."
This judgment reinforces the principle of party autonomy in commercial contracts and the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards. It provides clarity that high interest rates in genuine commercial transactions, especially those involving significant risk, will generally be upheld by courts.
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for specific legal guidance. The information provided is based on judicial interpretation and may be subject to changes in law.
Making Supreme Court judgments accessible and actionable for every Indian citizen navigating legal challenges.
This analysis decodes a complex commercial loan dispute to help businesses and individuals understand their rights and obligations in loan agreements and arbitration proceedings.